Material (15) 3rd Bali killings

https://chihaukam.blogspot.com/2023/08/and-gentlemen-complaints-about-leisure.html?m=1

.

Ref: https://chihaukam.blogspot.com/2025/11/take-look_3.html?m=1.

.

John: Take a look.  https://johnkamchihau.blogspot.com/2026/06/httpsjohnchihau_01920093938.html?m=1. It explains the environment of massacre. 

Me: Ok.

John : Mr. Lo is the person in this link. https://wodewangzhishime.blogspot.com/2021/09/httpswodewangzhishime_20.html?m=1.  

______

.

Kelvin: Look at this camera.  It hack the satellite of America.  Through this camera,  don't you see that John is walking to this spy's company ?

Mr. Lo: Yes,

Kelvin: About 20 minutes,  John will arrive.  You ask Mr. Meng, the buildings "officer",  to make fun of John. 

.

Mr. Lo: How? 

.

Kelvin: You ask Mr. Meng to ambush at the corridor of this spy's company. When he see John arriving, he suddenly show up and say to John, "The tenants owed the property owner money. You should be responsible for it.". Isn't it funny? 

____

.

Bradley : Kill those students, e.g., Kelvin, Mr. Lo and Mr. Meng. 

Miuson : They are naive students. 

Bradley : Kill them. Can't you hear me ?

Miuson: Any alternative ?

Bradley: Alternative ? Yes, you ask them to kill people. 

Miuson : Take a look.https://john-kam.blogspot.com/2026/09/httpsjohnkamchihau_01482493830.html?m=1  .I killed 600 people in Bali.  Let them go.

Bradley : Those 600 victims died from the case of David and Rudy.  Yet, in the case of John,  you didn't on behalf of Kelvin,  Mr. Lo and Mr. Meng kill people. 

.

Miuson: David and Rudy have military intention.  They carry out mass surveillance.  Yet, in John's case,  Kelvin,  Mr. Lo and Mr. Meng didn't have military intention.  They only use the satellite to infringe the privacy of John.  It's not a mass surveillance.  Why should I kill people on behalf of them. 

.

Bradley: I don't care. You gotta on behalf of them kill people. 

.

__

.

Me: Eventually,  did Miuson on behalf of Kelvin,  Mr. Lo and Mr. Meng kill people. 

John : No, he didn't.  I don't encourage anyone to kill people. Yet,  in my case, Miuson didn't on behalf of "any learner" kill people. It's disastrous in the long run. 

Me: Why? 

John: Kelvin would  think wisely , " If it's not a mass surveillance,  if it has no military intention,  nobody died. It's Terrific. ".. 

Me: Terrific ?

John: Yes, and then. Kelvin keep hacking me. Non stop. 

Me (stunned): Non stop?

John: Yes, and then,  Kelvin keep saying to his students surrounding,  "Hey. Guys. John is an example.  He's surveillanced by me.  You guys come close and observe John Closely.  You guys soliloquize,  'A terrific example.  Thanks.  Professor. ' .".

Me: Thanks. Professor ?

John: Yes, .