Material (69) the explosion of Spain (2004)

https://chihaukam.blogspot.com/2024/03/have-look.html

.

Ref: https://chihaukam.blogspot.com/2024/03/have-look.html.

.

1) If it is an atheist war, the mortality soar. For example, the Soviet-German war. 25 millions people die. There's hierarchy and sector. There's different jobs and participants.

.

2) If it is a religious Jihad, the mortality deminish. There isn't any hierarchy and sector, but, common spirit and brotherhood. The explosion of Spain (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Madrid_train_bombings . ) is a typical example. Only 200 people die.

.

John: See this article. (https://chihaukam.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post.html) . Miss Fong declare that COVID is an atheist war. Consequently, she is the soldier of the backline. Based on the regulation of army, she hasn't the authority for murdering the pagans.

Me: However, Miss Fong never thank a war. Neither does Miss Fong thank the soldiers of frontline  .

John: Miss Fong just think, "COVID is an atheist war. Oh! It's wonderful. It's a good chance for me to learn how to hack the telecom.".

Me: Imagine. If COVID is a "terrorist's attack" and a "religious Jihad", Miss Fong can't but murder the pagans too. There're many hackers in America. However, the only hacker who I always stand by is "Bradley" . Indeed, I don't know his name is "Bradley" or not. I just assume that his name is "Bradley". Why do I stand by him ? After explosion of Spain, Bradley say in high profile that it is a terrorist's attack done by Al Qaeda. <--- It is honest, humble, sacred, brave, and, lenient.

.

John: Why do you "define" the explosion of Spain as a relgious Jihad and terrorist's attack ?

Bradley: Even if I define it as an atheist war, so what ? Miss Fong still never thank a war . Miss Fong still never thank the soldiers of the frontline. Why should I define the explosion of the train of Spain as an atheist war?

John: If the explosion of Spain is atheist, we just give an opportunity for Miss Fong to learn the hacker's techniques.

Bradley: That's true.


Comments